Brands
YSTV
Discover
Events
Newsletter
More

Follow Us

twitterfacebookinstagramyoutube
Yourstory
search

Brands

Resources

Stories

General

In-Depth

Announcement

Reports

News

Funding

Startup Sectors

Women in tech

Sportstech

Agritech

E-Commerce

Education

Lifestyle

Entertainment

Art & Culture

Travel & Leisure

Curtain Raiser

Wine and Food

Videos

ADVERTISEMENT

NPCI's new guidelines for UPI-based cash withdrawal at kirana and local retailers

NPCI stated the guidelines involving a UPI-based cash withdrawal is exactly like the Cash-at-PoS model as permitted by the RBI. However, the only change made is the standardised withdrawal limit.

NPCI's new guidelines for UPI-based cash withdrawal at kirana and local retailers

Friday February 21, 2020 , 4 min Read

Retail payments organisation National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) is all set to extend the existing Cash-at-PoS model use-case to its UPI platform.  


Earlier in August 2019, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had asked banks to extend the facility of cash withdrawal through debit cards at merchant shops. Now, NPCI is setting out similar guidelines for UPI-based digital payment players offering this use-case to its customers.   


UPI



According to the minutes of the UPI working group meeting held on February 14 as per documents accessed by YourStory, members along with the NPCI agreed on the following guidelines for cash withdrawal at merchant locations using UPI:  

To curb fraud 

To control the misuse of the facility, per transaction withdrawal limit is capped to Rs 2,000 and total withdrawals are capped to three transactions per day permitted for each customer.  


NPCI will also allocate a separate MCC (Merchant Category Code) to this transaction. An MCC classifies a business by the types of goods or services (payments) it provides or accepts.


TPAP or third party app providers are expected to add a specific transaction in the UPI-enabled app and push the separate MCC allocated by NPCI for the transaction involving cash withdrawal. 


Further, NPCI has also strictly stated that the customer acquirer has to ensure compliance, where no additional charges are levied by the merchant on the customer.    

Fees to be charged

According to the confidential document accessed by YourStory, the fee structure as agreed by the members include an interchange fee of 0.5 percent of the transaction value which will be capped to Rs 5. An interchange fee is the transaction fee made by the remitter's or customer’s bank account to the beneficiary's or merchant’s bank.   


Further, the issuer bank or service provider can decide to charge the customer up to one percent of the transaction value which will be capped to Rs 10.   


The NPCI further stated that the facility replicates the debit card model as permitted by the RBI, however, the only change made is the increase of withdrawal limit from Rs 1,000 and Rs 2,000 for various cities. The members agreed to adopt a uniform limit of Rs 2,000 for UPI-based cashout.  


Moreover, the NPCI (switching) and PSP fees continue to be as per the existing UPI transaction model.   


NPCI will issue the circular and provide two months implementation time to the issuer.

Why is this important? 

Recently, players like Bengaluru-based PhonePe have launched its ‘PhonePe ATM’ service, allowing users to locate nearby stores, where they can go and make P2P transfers to shop owners and get physical cash in return.     


Further, while announcing the service in January, PhonePe said that this is entirely based on the rail of P2P transactions, provided by the UPI network. 


YourStory tried reaching out to NPCI and players, including PhonePe and Paytm, who were not available for immediate comment.   


Industry experts who didn’t want to be named stated that the move could also be a revenue stream for some players who might be affected by the revision to zero-MDR for merchant-based UPI payments. 


They also claimed that the used-case would not be so popular if players start charging the same and would call the user to use these services only in distressed situations.  


Another player, who didn’t want to be named, said that discussions are still going on with NPCI to reconsider the costs associated with the service, the clarity on which is expected to come in the coming weeks. 


However, some banks are worried that payment providers might not have systems in place which can check for fake currency disbursements, as well as anti-money laundering systems if the service picks up in a big way.


(Edited by Suman Singh)