The Supreme Court today made it clear that Aadhaar cards cannot be made mandatory by the government and its agencies for extending benefits of social welfare schemes.
A bench comprising Chief Justice J.S. Khehar and Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and S.K. Kaul, however, said that the government and its agencies cannot be stopped from seeking Aadhaar cards for non-welfare schemes like the opening of bank accounts. The bench also said that a seven-judge bench needed to be constituted for authoritatively deciding a batch of petitions challenging the Aadhaar scheme on several grounds, including that it infringes on citizens' right to privacy. It, however, expressed inability in setting up the seven-judge bench, saying it would be decided at a later stage.
Senior advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for one of the petitioners, alleged that the central government is not following the various orders passed by the apex court stating that the usage of Aadhaar would be voluntary and not mandatory.
The apex court on August 11, 2015, had said that Aadhaar cards would not be mandatory for availing benefits of the government's welfare schemes and barred the authorities from sharing personal biometric data collected for enrolment under the scheme. However, on October 15, 2015, it had lifted its earlier restriction and permitted the voluntary use of Aadhaar cards in welfare schemes that also included MGNREGA, all pension schemes, and the provident fund, besides ambitious flagship programmes like the 'Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna' of the NDA government.
A five-judge bench headed by the then-Chief Justice H.L. Dattu had also put a caveat in its interim order for the Centre, and said, "We also make it clear that the Aadhaar card scheme is purely voluntary and not mandatory, till the matter is finally decided by this court, this way or the other way."
The bench, while including the four other schemes along with LPG and PDS where Aadhaar may be used, had said, "The Union of India is to follow all other orders passed by this court since September 23, 2013."
The bench had also said that a larger bench was required to be set up for final disposal of the petitions that also include the question as to whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right.
Divan, representing one of the petitioners who has challenged the Aadhaar card scheme, had claimed that the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which runs the programme, is neither backed by any law nor by any notification, and is getting biometric details through private agencies. The lawyers for the petitioners had contended that the scheme is "all pervasive", and is not foolproof either, and hence, cannot be used for other programmes.
On October 14, 2015, the apex court took note of the Centre's plea that Aadhaar cards be allowed to be used "voluntarily" for welfare programmes other than PDS and LPG schemes, and asked whether it could assure that nobody would be at a "disadvantageous" position for want of Aadhaar.
Want to make your startup journey smooth? YS Education brings a comprehensive Funding Course, where you also get a chance to pitch your business plan to top investors. Click here to know more.
- Supreme Court
- Government of India
- Unique Identification Authority of India
- Central Government
- bank accounts
- Chief Justice
- Ration card
- Shyam Divan
- Senior advocate
- Union of India
- Just In