Ashneer Grover files plea claiming BharatPe's investigation against him illegal

Ashneer Grover, Co-founder and Managing Director, BharatPe, has filed an arbitration plea with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), claiming that despite multiple representations and objections, BharatPe has kept the review assessment process against him opaque.

First reported by the Mint, Grover claims he was not given a chance to present his case, and this makes the entire process prejudicial. The text of the plea claims, "the claimant [Grover] stands to suffer extreme prejudice if the operation of the review committee is not prevented and stands to suffer irreparable harm and damage."

ALSO READ

BharatPe's Ashneer Grover wants to get into politics

Additionally, the plea seems to suggest the creation of the review committee in itself could be violating the shareholder agreement (SHA) and the company's articles of association. The plea reads, "The review committee, which is constituted in violation of the terms of the SHA, continues to act to the detriment of the claimant."

In addition to the arbitration plea against the review committee, Grover also seems to be asking for injunctive relief against some of the decisions BharatPe has made since the beginning of the investigation.

One of the more high profile requests includes asking for Suhail Sameer's appointment as director to be delayed until a new investigation committee is formed and a review is conducted by them.

ALSO READ

Ashneer Grover vs BharatPe: Why CEO Suhail Sameer's board seat matters

This follows Grover's comments on BharatPe CEO Sameer over the last month. However, Sameer's removal as director will need consent from co-founder Shasvat Nakrani as well.

Speaking to the Mint, Fereshte Sethna, Senior Partner at DMD Advocates, said these legal manoeuvres may only delay the inevitable. Sethna said, “Multiple reasons abound to initiate legal challenges — often for achieving temporary strategic pushback — but absent compelling reasons, it may not withstand scrutiny."

Furthermore, with regards to the accusations on the board's actions with regards to the review committee and process, Sethna stated, "The board is all-powerful."